Have you ever had the feeling of continuing a battle, regardless whether you were losing or winning, just continuing for the heck of it? It was like whichever side winning or losing, it didn't matter anymore. What kept the adrenaline going was the spirit, enjoyment, the excitement of the battle itself. It was like you were born to be a fighter, not a soldier. A soldier followed orders from commander, and thus winning or losing really matter. But a fighter, no, a fighter simply fights just for the adrenaline rush. The feeling of excitement, the thrill, the direct stimulation to your brain, it satisfies your hunger. Battle, how horrific it is, has become an art in the hand of a fighter.
Imagine a situation where a fighter fights a soldier. One side concentrates on winning, while the other focusing on the excitement. It disappoints the fighter, who enjoys long, hard-fought battle, to find that his opponent only cares about winning. He may just leave the scene, frustrated with what is going on. He may even give the victory to the soldier, realizing that the battle is not worth fighting for. Soldier may be overjoyed with the victory, whereas a fighter simply finds another worthy opponent.
That’s the difference. A soldier kills the opponent even though the opponent is unarmed, while a fighter helps the opponent recovers for another good battle in future.
Is victory that important, or is it overrated? You might win the battle, but I’ll make sure I win the damn war..
Imagine a situation where a fighter fights a soldier. One side concentrates on winning, while the other focusing on the excitement. It disappoints the fighter, who enjoys long, hard-fought battle, to find that his opponent only cares about winning. He may just leave the scene, frustrated with what is going on. He may even give the victory to the soldier, realizing that the battle is not worth fighting for. Soldier may be overjoyed with the victory, whereas a fighter simply finds another worthy opponent.
That’s the difference. A soldier kills the opponent even though the opponent is unarmed, while a fighter helps the opponent recovers for another good battle in future.
Is victory that important, or is it overrated? You might win the battle, but I’ll make sure I win the damn war..
3 comments:
deep.
but, is winning the war compensate for the lost?
p/s: aku tak paham sebenarnya ni pasal apa. saja wat2 macam paham. hehe.
war can be won without losses. if there is no losses, what would we compensate for? that's the difference when you go to war with a fighter and a soldier.
compensate for the resources used?
Post a Comment